Thursday, 28 June 2012

Keep clear of Merchant Navy !!

Request all to share this picture, tag as many of your friends as you find relevant and spread the word. 

Joining Merchant Navy at this point of time is a very risky call. Particularly so for TSC. The institute's management is in a mess and cadets are not getting any support for placement. Please spread this message.

Sunday, 17 June 2012

Calling all ex-cadets to join us as an activist and help us spread the message. The Activists will be supplied with special materials and guidance by our team to help them spread the message and engage in guiding aspirants locally in present location. Our team will be in direct touch with the Activists to take the cause forward and achieve our targets. Please fill in the form below if you are ready to do your bit for the cause. Our team will get in touch with you.

Unemployment Chronicle IV

"...because I am you" initiative does not necessarily subscribe to all the views/figures expressed in these letters. These are personal opinions of Mr. Govindarajan and is being shared on our platform with his consent to reach a larger audience and particularly make the aspirants aware of the profession they wish to join. Readers are requested to ratiocinate before believing any of our posts !

S.GOVINDARAJAN                                           D 4 Juniper Apartments                                 AK 55 TAS enclave
Mob: 93817 43705                                          Anna nagar, Chennai 600040
                                                                01 February 2012

Dr.Satish. B. Agnihotri, IAS
Director General of Shipping
Jahaz Bhavan, Walchand Hirachand Marg, Mumbai

Dear Dr.Agnihotri,

I refer to my letters dated 21 Sept 11, and 29th October 2012, expressing my concern and urging your speedy actions to curtail the flooding of young aspirants in the Indian market, seeking job placement with shipping companies.

As the situation of unemployment of these youngsters has reached a critical stage, I would be grateful if I could be apprised of your actions taken in response to my various appeals.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincere regards

Yours most sincerely,

Marine Engineer Consultant

Unemployment Chronicle III

"...because I am you" initiative does not necessarily subscribe to all the views/figures expressed in these letters. These are personal opinions of Mr. Govindarajan and is being shared on our platform with his consent to reach a larger audience and particularly make the aspirants aware of the profession they wish to join. Readers are requested to ratiocinate before believing any of our posts !

S.GOVINDARAJAN                                           D 4 Juniper Apartments                                 AK 55 TAS enclave
Mob: 93817 43705                                          Anna nagar, Chennai 600040
                                                                29th October 2011

Dr.Satish. B. Agnihotri, IAS
Director General of Shipping
Jahaz Bhavan, Walchand Hirachand Marg, Mumbai

Dear Dr.Agnihotri,

I refer to my letter dated 21 Sept 11, now more than one month since appeal to your good selves.
Perhaps, the content of my appeal are under scrutiny, or not is even not known to me as on date. However, I wish to bring to your kind attention following further points, which may assist expediting your actions over my requests made in my earlier letter.

It is the foremost responsibility of the D G Shipping to well safeguard the handful of young citizens who have trusted their approvals of training Institutes and enthusiastically stepped into the marine education.  The waiting cadets are not looking for lifelong protection of their jobs by DGS.  They are only looking for shipboard slots of training that they could undergo to take up their 1st level of certificate of competency.  This is not asking too much.  DGS first made training circular 15 of 2006, to put the onus on the training Institutes to obtain training slots at the end of the graduation, failing which they should compensate the student by return of his fees spent. Then through DGS circulars 1 of 2007 and 2008, as a measure of relaxation, your esteemed office again modified the strategy putting the responsibility on the training institutes to tie up with shipping companies to get training slot for their cadets, failing which they should reduce their intake.  Three years have passed by; DGS is yet to take stern view of training Institutes towards bringing remedy to the suffering students.  During this time DGS also have not even curbed the intake by training Institutes through a strict enforcement as the Administrative Authority.

When the subordinate organisations (such as training Institutes) have failed, the entire responsibility for the outcome is squarely on the shoulders of DGS only as the Superior Authority.  DGS hold all options in their hands to exercise their influence /Authority with Indian /foreign flag owners/managers/agents to create additional training slots for the new aspirants. 

In my opinion, DGS certainly should be able act on the following lines, under the circumstances:

1. Immediately stop the 4 years and 3 years stream of engineering and nautical degrees to curb the emerging graduates, at least for a period of time, as DGS being the sole controlling Authority to safeguard the situation.

2. Consult INSA/MASSA/FOSMA for finding maximum shipboard training slots, and absorb waiting cadets of nautical and engineering streams.  They may relax some rules of restriction with regard to life boat capacities on coastal vessels, especially by addition of life rafts on board.

3. Cadets may be paid a small token of stipend during this time, if not the current level practised by most reputed companies.

4.  Ensure that there will be no malpractice by touts and unauthorised agents who hold trainees for a ransom demanding a lot of money to seek their due on-board slots.

5. If some immediate subsidy is needed for this from DGS level, certainly they could look at spending   from the 1% fees which DGS have earned from training Institutes all along.

6.  Pressurise training Institutes to spend a part of the fees to sponsor cadets for the on-board     slots.

In this juncture the professional Bodies such as Institute of Marine engineers (IMEI), Nautical Institute, Company of Master Mariners can pool out their strength and discuss to find positive solutions to the current plight of the cadets, rather than passively watching or simply stating that this is recession time!  IMEI and other Institutes may device to sponsor loans to needy cadets and can retrieve the same once the cadet successfully complete his 1st level of competency and progressed further.

To activate with speed, DGS may set up a panel to make urgent, (time targeted) study on how if the acquired training ships could be put under one or more ship managements whose sole function is dedicated to overseeing training for the minimum period required of the basic STCW/CoC level.



In my letters addressed to your esteemed office, it may be felt that I have not given due weight of words demanding a protocol.  I humbly request your forgiveness, as I hold your office in sincere reverence and wish to uphold your position of Authority, viewed as the Single effective arm of protection for the cause for which the letters had been addressed.

Sincere regards

Yours most sincerely,

Marine Engineer Consultant

Unemployment Chronicle II

"...because I am you" initiative does not necessarily subscribe to all the views/figures expressed in these letters. These are personal opinions of Mr. Govindarajan and is being shared on our platform with his consent to reach a larger audience and particularly make the aspirants aware of the profession they wish to join. Readers are requested to ratiocinate before believing any of our posts !


=========================== quote=====================
Dear Shri. Agnihotri,                   
     Sub:  Over supply of Engine Cadets, Deck Cadets, Ratings leading to
               Unemployed of young maritime personnel- grievance regarding.

                                         Good day.  I am a social worker, trade unionist and crusader against corruption. I had been associated with the trade union affairs of Chennai Port trust, dock labour board for over 4 decades. I am also the head quarters secretary of ANTI CORRUPTION movement, a Chennai based NGO.  Our efforts over the last 4 years under the RTI act requesting the ED (Enforcement Directorate) to reveal the names of the persons who held the Swiss bank by evading tax in our county, and subsequent hearing by the Central Information Commission (CIC) and the judgement of the CIC ruling in our favour, demonstrate our commitment to public life. The ED has gone for an appeal in Delhi HC against the verdict.

             Whenever the matters of concern for the welfare of seafarers brought to my notice I had taken up the issue at the appropriate level to bring justice and solace to the affected. On few occasions the DGS issued circulars taking note of my appeal.  
                    India has been an important maritime nation over the last few centuries. The Directorate General of Shipping, Government of India, in order to ensure fair distribution of employment among available seamen and to eradicate the malpractices in recruitment had controlled effectively the pre-sea training institutes. These pre-sea training institutes were initially run by the government/ public sectors.  In 1997   the DGS approved training institutions in private sector to select and train candidates for pre-sea training without any necessity for sponsorship from shipping companies, based on guidelines issued by the Ministry of Surface Transport, Government of India, due to the campaign "MANNING CRISIS”. Many shipping companies also started their own training facilities to upgrade their standards, to train their own cadets and to retain their skilled workforce, beside it had helped the companies to interact with their crew during their vacation.
        The private institute’s  assertion (& the shipping  industry’s claims )about the  so called “MANNING CRISIS”, namely, an acute industry- wide shortage of qualified seagoing officers and ratings, little is known about an equally undesirable oversupply of  Engine, Deck cadets and ratings. This over supply results in rendering seafaring particularly precarious for the junior level officers & trainee level ratings, which may be seen as another crisis. By making the propaganda that there is “manning crisis”, the worldwide shortage for skilled maritime officers is on the rise and the demand for seafarers has not declined even in the current global economic downturn,   the private maritime institutes have managed to convince the DGS and enhanced their intake capacities many folds / started new courses over the last few years.
                               Beside those who run these private institutes left no stones unturned to create a false image that there will be shortage of sea farers in future. It is claimed that they engineered the presentations submitted during the many seminars, workshops, Symposiums, conventions that are held in the maritime related fields to indicate falsely about the so called “MANNING CRISIS”.  This was ably supported by some vested ship-owners predominantly from the developed world as this would give them more option to “pick and choose” the seafarers from developing countries at significantly lower costs. These claims even made the government of India to establish IMU (Indian maritime University) and spread its wings. It is a pity that even those who had successfully completed their course in the IMU did not get any placement.     
            The private institutes located at  ( the  fig in parenthesis indicate the no of institutes as per 2010 record) Mumbai(38) ,Chennai(17), Kolkata (11)Goa(6),Cochin (5), Pune(4), Others (43)  for their sheer pleasure of making money have played havoc with the life of many youth in India mostly hailing from North East of India & Jharkhand. It is feared that many influential persons on seeing the prospects of these private institutes are planning start many more such institutes some are to be located in the North East India.
                     The Unfortunate youth who are unaware of the shipping industry   joined the pre-sea training for various grades as they were impressed by the advertisements released by the private training institutes promising lucrative salary just after completing the course. It is alleged that during the preadmission process most of the private institutes display the media coverage’s and other shipping news cuttings indicating falsely high demand for the merchant navy cadets / ratings.  The uniforms, strict discipline during the training impress the parents to admit their wards.  The Students after spending about 12 to 16 lakhs of Rupees towards their education do not get any employment opportunity in ships due to oversupply. There is no positive promise for assured job on ships by the private as well as IMU. The CDC (sea man book) which was earlier given only against the sponsorship from the shipping company, now a day’s issued against the completion of training and the mandatory STCW courses, the DGS declaration in the CDC application form   “issuance of CDC does not guarantee a job which is the prerogative of the employers”, proves beyond doubt that the such issue of CDC without the employment letter serve the interest of the private training institutes only. Many agents fleece innocent Youth stating that, once they  get a CDC they are only a few days away from getting lucrative salary.
                It is felt that even though the DGS officials could not allocate time, amidst their daunting task of conducting the inspection of ships and various competency examinations, to monitor the  growth  of private institutes, they had amply governed the maritime institutes  during the initial few years, but later due to pressure from  political /private institutes , they become silent, is understood to be the major  factor behind the granting approvals  to many institutes, which had created the unwarranted situation which has thrown the life of many youth in peril.  I would like to recall that, during 1991~1992, when the Chennai Port Trust admitted more trainees than the approved strength the DGS intervened and ensured restoration of sanctioned strength, because of such action the Chennai port Trust had to suspend the training to many trainees and cleared the back log in a phased manner always  maintaining the DGS directive.  Similar corrective action is required now from the DGS officials to bring hope to thousands of unemployed youth in our country besides preventing further exploitation of youth.
                  The seafarers have been subjected to all forms of abuse in the shipping industry, resulted in the implementation of MLC 2006. The MLC is bound to take care of the sailing seafarers; the DGS would ensure it is implemented properly in Indian flag and the others through strict PSC Inspections. The DGS should act immediately to prevent the worst form of exploitation of youth Indian youth under the pretext of providing them maritime career.
                It is painful to note the plight of the young men (some women too) who joined maritime institutes with high hopes of shaping their career in shipping   are unable find their feet on ships for furthering their career path.  There are plans by some unscrupulous persons with political backing to buy / charter ships and train these unfortunate youth in mass( collecting fees from the already frustrated youth instead of paying them salary (of course these business men will eventually convince the DGS for the same) again squeezing the unfortunate youth and their parents. It is doubted that whether such training in mass would meet the shipping industry standards?  The fame which Indian maritime professionals earned over the centuries would get ruined by these awkward training mooted by some vested interest. Already many foreign companies have started absorbing the Chinese, Ukrainian, Russian and the Thai cadets instead of Indians. Such substandard training mooted by someone will aggravate the situation further, as these unfortunate youth will be again jobless after the training on such ships.       

     The plight of those who underwent  the 4 year course leading to B.Tech in Marine Engineering, BS (marine Engineering) is highly pathetic as they were not able to pursue higher studies Like post graduation in engineering    ( like ME) as the B.Tech in Marine Engineering, BS (marine Engineering)  course is not approved by AICTE.  (as per AICTE these courses cannot be treated as equivalent to a university degree approved by AICTE, as only the MEO Class 1 COC is treated as equivalent AICTE approved university degree). Terming these 4 year course as B.Tech and BS in Marine Engineering has misled many to become victims. Worst are the candidates who studied in the off campus institutes under BITS (BRILLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE) as it did not have either AICTE or UGC approval, but has DGS approval.  Even though the DGS is not issuing them the Degree, the DGS has approved these institutes to function and set the syllabus hence the DGS is duty bound to help these unfortunate youth. Many unemployed youth with BE Marine qualifications had studied IT/ computer related courses, but they had a shock of their life when the IT companies did not even consider them for calling for interview in view of their Marine qualification (fearing that these marine persons will not stay with them).  It is understood that Vels University, Chennai is not in a position to confer graduate degree for the first three batches of Marine engineering BE students as there were partial indulgence with Vinayaka Mission Research Foundation University, Salem.  The first three batches of marine engineering students are most aggrieved that they do not possess a proper University degree, as promised by Vels University (deemed University).
                I appeal on behalf of the affected youth that    
1.       DGS should create a data base of all unemployed Engine cadets, Deck cadets and Ratings and work out a scheme to provide them chance to join ship or an alternative employment to alleviate their sufferings. If no solution is found, at least these data base will serve the purpose of giving warning to the institute from making false propaganda. There should be continuous monitoring instead of a onetime action. The government itself should collect such data instead of appointing any agency.
2.        The 3 yrs degree stream of BSc Nautical Science and 4 years Degree stream of BE marine engineering and the training for the Ratings should be suspended for a period of time or abolished, to prefer intake of graduates in Mech engineering and other areas of engineering through pre-GME courses (currently under study by DGS STCW cell) . 3 years BSc nautical science is said to be a total failure and unwelcome by the shipping companies, due to low standards.  Training for nautical students should restrict to DNS course under IGNOU/IMU only.
3.         Continued approval can be given only to institutes which place all its cadets / more than 90% of its cadets on ships. The private institute should not be allowed to brush aside their responsibility as they lured the youth by lucrative advertisement.
4.       Though the DGS circular 15 of 2006 was issued in favour of students of private institutes to be paid a refund for such students not getting shipboard training slots to qualify for 1st level CoC exams, the training Institutes have cleverly manipulated the situation by having this order repealed and supderceded by DGS circulars 1 of 2007 and 1 of 2008. It is now important for DGS to strictly implement the students getting partial refund of their fees or sailing slots in some reputed shipping company.
5.       The first three batches of BE students from Vels University, Chennai should be conferred their degree status from IMU/or any other authorized University approved by UGC that these students may be able to pursue their higher studies in India or abroad.  The University authorities should be answerable for their default from their responsibility, this  being a serious lapse tantamount to defrauding innocent public.

6.        The 5th engineer and the Deck cadet’s ranks should be made mandatory on ships registered in India to increase the employment opportunity.  Issue should be taken up with the IMO to insist, ship’s registered with other flags to follow suit.
7.        The CDC should be issued only against the sponsorship from the shipping company to prevent the agents using the CDC as a tool for cheating.
8.         All the advertisement released by the private and the IMU calling for admissions should have the approval from DGS and clearly indicate the course  approval by AICTE / UGC etc., and the true placement record.
9.       The DGS should make adequate publicity to sensitise public, with vide coverage in the North Eastern states to prevent the unaware youth becoming victims to the touts and agents.
10.     No new institute to be given approval. If any approval is given in the recent past and the institute is yet to begin admission, the given approval should be Withdrawn. There is an industry vide opinion that some institute want to change over completely to GME programme (to offer one year training to the BE Mechanical graduates) to replace the present B.Tech and BS marine engineering, this would also create another crisis. Such change over can be approved IF AND ONLY IF the backlog of cadets is cleared. To be verified by the data base as mentioned in point no.1.
11.     Steps should be taken to prevent agents and the unscrupulous persons making money by offering the so called mass training on board ship by collecting huge money from the aspiring and eligible cadets and ratings stating that these training will make them “certified officer” , “certified rating” and they can get placed on ships once they become certified. Such fleecing activity should be curtailed once and for all. The Ministry of Shipping should provide such training to ensure competence, and to keep up Indian’s traditional positions as the best sea farers producing nation. 
12.    The  BE (Marine Engineering) / B.Sc Nautical  Science graduates, can be offered to undergo  some bridge course to enable them to get a qualification acceptable to AICTE / UGC to enable them to   pursue further studies/ seek job elsewhere, without involving any cost. The DGS should take initiative and seek the help of    “The Ministry of Human Resources” to chalk out a programme to help these unfortunate youth. Power Engineers Training Society, under ministry of power can be requested to train the BE Marine candidates to enable them to join power stations.
13.   We urge DG Shipping to make all out efforts to ensure every one of the backlog trainees who have come out of the training institutes (Approved by DGS) will be offered a shipboard training slot at no burden of additional expenditure.  Having spent enormous money already through their graduation (through loans secured from banks), this is an URGENT requirement.
            During the past years, the DGS always responded positively and rendered justice to any appeal made by me on behalf of sailing sea fares.  I hope and trust this appeal on behalf of the innocent youth would also receive proper attention and  action from the DGS  to bring an assurance to the affected youth.
Thanking you,
Best regards,
================================== un quote=======================

Unemployment Chronicle I

The unemployment problem in Merchant Navy at entry level is already in its 3rd year. With absolutely no action taken by the authorities to control the situation the problem is only poised to deteriorate. Here we bring you collection of four letters sent to the DGS and other authorities over past few months by Senior Marine Consultant Mr. S. Govindarajan. None of these letters have received any response from the authorities they were addressed to. 

"...because I am you" initiative does not necessarily subscribe to all the views/figures expressed in these letters. These are personal opinions of Mr. Govindarajan and is being shared on our platform with his consent to reach a larger audience and particularly make the aspirants aware of the profession they wish to join. Readers are requested to ratiocinate before believing any of our posts !

21 September 2011 15:32
To: ''
Subject: Absence of employment opportunities for new aspinrants n merchant shipping

Thiru. G.K.Vasan
The Honourable Minister of Shipping

Dear Honourable Minister Thiru Vasan,

I am marine Chief engineer having associated with the shipping industry for last 42 years in various capacities.  The last 12 years I had devoted towards imparting training to both post sea and pre-sea categories of students.

I wish to bring the following matters of concern to your respected Shipping Ministry to Govt. of India,  to enable necessary steps from the Government of India level, to bring relief  and hope to a large number of qualified marine graduates (nautical & marine  engineering)  who are being denied opportunities to sail on board for fulfilling the sea time requirements for taking up even the 1st level of certificate of competency examinations.

I am deeply  saddened with the present state of affairs when  successful marine students coming out of the DGS approved institutions are unable find their feet on ships for furthering their career path.  The result is one of frustration for these young lots and seen as great opportunity for unscrupulous agents /touts to whom the young aspirants fall prey.  Lot of parents have called me over phone and in person to express their sorrow and dismay over their ward’s future.

In my recent capacity as the Director of Maritime Studies, School of Maritime Studies, Vels University, I made efforts to contact many shipping companies with our invitation for taking up campus placement and as well as post campus interviews for the boys for selection to go to sea.  The response received was quite inadequate to promise placement for all the nautical and marine engineering students.  The reasons attributed for inability from some shipping companies is as follows:

1.       The shipping business is low and their fleet strength is much reduced.
2.       Quite a number of their managed ships have shifted over to other nationals,  as better choice.
3.       Some companies are constrained to absorb the entire lot of students passing out of DMET/MERI, due to their obligation to satisfy DG Shipping/IMU.
4.       Many of the companies having their own training institute started,  have enough supplies of cadets of both streams.
5.       Quite many companies have said that they are full up as selected cadets are themselves in long waiting list for many months, not justifying new recruitments
6.       Some Indian companies are unable to accommodate trainee cadets, for want of life boat capacity.

It is quite a heart-breaking experience hearing every day from anxious cadets denied even an opportunity for the fairness of personal interview in shipping companies. Students after spending a large sum (either through parents selling their properties or burdensome loans with EMI dues threatening them) towards their education in private training Institutes find themselves useless, redundant,  unwelcome even at their entry level to the shipping Industry.  Their  experiences are contrary to the attractive media adverts, from training Institutes, brain washing the new aspirants with false promises about shaping up their dream career in shipping to reality, if only they graduate through their Institutes.  Much is done to enforce a life of regimentation and discipline in the marine training institutes, without a positive promise of their future assured job on ships.

I am of the view that It is wrong on the part of the DGS Administration to expect the training Institutes to provide shipboard slots, while it is not their specialised area.  If it was the DGS administration who opened up the gates of training through private training Institutes, it is then the DGS responsibility to provide the necessary minimum shipboard training slots for all students, duly admitted under the DGS approved schemes . When the private training institutes were given approval for conducting the graduate courses in maritime education, DGS should have ensured that MASSA/FOSMA oriented and all other Indian shipping companies will only converge their tie up with definite intake from DGS approved training institutes, unified with standards stipulated by DGS.  On the other hand, DGS continued granting approvals to the shipping companies opening up their own pre-sea training centres, ignoring already approved training centres.  Well if this is considered a wiser step, then why DGS allowed private training Institutes not meeting with standards expected by shipping companies?

I am of the opinion that the Onus heavily rests only on the DGS Administration and Shipping Ministry of Govt. of India to immediately respond to the sorry plight of unemployed young and energetic marine graduates, looking up for senior responsible officials to pave way to their future.

I wish to point out at this juncture, Your respected Ministry should not spare any effort to  most urgently acquire at least ten training ships, catering for the necessary minimum on board training for the waiting nautical and engineering cadets, throwing no financial burden on these cadets, who have already heavily incurred expenditure towards their maritime education.

To rationalise maritime education, I am of the firm opinion that the 3 years degree stream of BSc (Nautical studies) and 4 years Degree stream of BE marine engineering should be abolished or at least suspended for a period of time, till such time all backlogs are cleared for marine graduates facing uncertain future.  To assist the private training Institutes to make effective use of their infrastructures, BE degree approvals could be converted towards more seats of intake of graduate engineers from different fields of specialisation and BSc nautical studies limited short pre-sea training followed by  3 years cadet ship (distant learning) like what used to be practised in the past years.

I urge your strong leadership to consider the contents of my appeal most seriously in favour of anxiously awaiting cadets of both nautical and engineering streams.  In my opinion, there is an atmosphere calling for urgent  steps likened to an emergent situation of hostage of a ship falling into the hands of pirates.  How can the plight of disappointed marine graduates any different from piracy hostages,  resulted as an outcome of rash decisions made by our Shipping Administration of our nation?

Warm regards

Yours Sincerely

Marine Consultant

Friday, 15 June 2012



This message is intended to serve in the better interests of innocent parents and students, who may feel attracted by white uniform and acclaimed disciplined training in the approved Institutes.